What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[Fidel_Castronaut]

So far the argument boils down to "yeah but it can't be evolution" (argument from incredulity) or "it must be designed" (fallacy of proof by assertion).

Asking "why don't people automatically assume it's a creator" is one of the weirdest ways of arguing against evolution I've ever come across.

Someone let me know if you get answers to your questions that aren't fallacious please and I'll check back in.