(February 19, 2016 at 3:56 am)robvalue Wrote: Notice how AAA is staying right away from supporting his actual own position, because he realises it's entirely unscientific. Instead he attacks the position of science and reason.
There's no way this guy is a science student. We had this all out before. If he somehow really is, this abandonment of the scientific method when it contradicts fairy tail narratives is going to be a very real hindrance to any scientific career. I'm not kidding. He needs to hear this for his own good.
I don't attack science, I love it. And so far, my academic career hasn't been hindered by my views. You specifically robvalue never respond to my response to you. And intelligent design is not unscientific. It fits the same criteria that any scientific theory about the past fits. Please give me a definition of science that both excludes intelligent design while allowing a naturalistic explanation for the origin of life.
