(February 20, 2016 at 12:35 am)abaris Wrote:(February 19, 2016 at 11:49 pm)AAA Wrote: Ok then how would you investigate the unobservable past?
You really go there? After claiming to love science? In which case you should at least be aware of how you observe what you call unobservable.
If you follow the conversation leading up to that point, I laid out a way to investigate the unobservable past, but stimbo kept saying that it wasn't science unless it could be done in a lab. I agree that you can investigate the unobservable past scientifically, I just wanted to see if he could answer it in a way that simultaneously rendered intelligent design unscientific while still permitting materialistic explanations scientific. I think they are both scientific. But not empirical, and by definition not repeatable.
