RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 20, 2016 at 1:40 pm
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2016 at 1:40 pm by abaris.)
(February 20, 2016 at 1:36 pm)AAA Wrote: So as long as it is a natural explanation it gets to avoid the criteria that make something science?
No, it's peer reviewed that makes it science. My field's history and so I know scientific methodology. Which is why I don't put much stock in apologists but only in people who actually know their trade.