What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[abaris]

Therefore it is based on what we DO know that we conclude it to be designed, not what we don't. And I'm not overly concerned with peer review.

WE most certainly don't conclude it to be designed. You do.

And not being overly concerned with peer review is on the same lines as not putting a new product to the test before it hits the market. It's dangerous, a botch job and certainly not the scientific approach.