RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 21, 2016 at 5:03 am
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2016 at 5:33 am by FebruaryOfReason.)
(February 18, 2016 at 7:21 pm)AAA Wrote: ...some words...
So because you can't see a rational explanation for this stuff, you've decided that - rather than to keep looking for a rational explanation - the best way forward is an irrational explanation?
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner. The lamest defence of Theism is (drum roll):
The God of Gaps.
Were you one of those guys who was saying up until a few weeks ago that there was no evidence for gravity waves, so current astronomical theories must be invalid, and therefore there is a God?
BTW. You expressed doubts that I have a degree. I could post a photo of it on here if you like. Just give me a ten digit number and the photo will include that as well.
But of course, that would just be me providing evidence, and in your book, evidence is irrelevant.
And if I can reproduce your ten digit number in my photo, I suppose you'll say it couldn't possibly have happened by coincidence and therefore God must have been involved?
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
