(February 21, 2016 at 1:15 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(February 21, 2016 at 12:58 pm)AAA Wrote: It's not like if it isn't peer reviewed it's making stuff up. Peer review is simply a good way to make sure that experimenters don't overlook things in their study, that they didn't fudge the data, and that they conducted it well.
Which must be why you aren't concerned about holding ID to the same standard of peer review as actual scientific papers. You have to know, at least on some level, that it cannot withstand the scrutiny.
I think they should be held to the same standard, but they aren't.
