RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 22, 2016 at 10:23 am
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2016 at 10:24 am by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(February 22, 2016 at 10:13 am)pool the great Wrote: Wait, bottom-up is still a design approach.. I think the point 3A is trying to make is that it wouldn't be possible for a system such as ours to have bottom-up designed itself into what it is today, if you look at it purely mathematically, as in probabilistically it would make sense because of the sheer amount of different scenarios and combinations that would have to take place and the time consumed before something even as simple as a cell had to be formed.
No, the trough of the bottom-up approach to making something is where no design is required at all, and AAA's sense of mathematical probability is in his ass.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
