RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
February 22, 2016 at 4:58 pm
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2016 at 5:04 pm by FebruaryOfReason.)
(February 22, 2016 at 4:37 pm)Drich Wrote:(February 22, 2016 at 3:41 pm)FebruaryOfReason Wrote: You're using the concepts of solar winds and planetary mass indexes to defend the internal inconsistencies in a story about a guy who built a boat big enough to hold two of everything in the world when he was 500 years old?
Seriously?
It disturbs me that people like you can vote and own firearms.
your using doubt and a sad attempt at a general dismissal to dismiss a scientific principle?
Seriously??
It disturbs me that you guys vote and try to pretend to be the 'enlightened ones.'
It's not a scientific principle. It's a hypothesis you haven't proved, or even offered anything at all to support. You might as well believe that the Flying Spaghetti Monster swallowed all the excess water - why not? There are no more or less reasons to believe it was all done via His Noodly Appendage.
And at least the FSM doesn't have a legacy of arbitrary murder. (1 Chronicles 13:9-10).
And don't talk to me about sad.
Pissing your life away on a fairytale that's full of holes, just because you don't have the balls to face the reality of death - that's what's sad.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
