(February 23, 2016 at 12:11 pm)Rhythm Wrote:1) It doesn't? How do you figure? Don't you agree that the way we get our meat now raises health concerns as well as environmental and economical ones? And wouldn't you agree that those problems would be mitigated by vitro meat?(February 23, 2016 at 12:07 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: It actually has a very important application in all of the spheres that the former process fails in, as in enviromental concerns, economy, health risks, long term sustainability and so on.It doesn't, but that makes great ad copy.
Quote:And there's no ideological debate to be had. We make sentient creatures suffer and die for our own survival/comfort and that becomes unethical once viable or even better alternatives are on offer.Sounds like there is....
2) So you don't agree that the animals we grow for food suffer in the process? What debate is there to be had about this?
Quote:In that they can fully deliver synthetic meats sure, you're expecting other goods. I think you'll be disappointed on -that- count. The synthetic meat itself is likely to be fantastic.
What other goods am I expecting?