(February 23, 2016 at 6:26 pm)Old Baby Wrote:I got it the first time, Even if I represented the absolute truth... You would not/could not believe what I had to say, because I am an "ass hole". In short you out of spite would not/could not believe what I had to say not based on content, but because of what you think of me personally...(February 23, 2016 at 4:06 pm)Drich Wrote: That's good.. You determine truth by how you personally judge the person providing the narrative.
Let me ask, are you allowed to vote?
Nice try, but no, that's not how I determine truth. Read it again.
My objection was to your bible-based Christianity, because you are an asshole.
Even if I believed in bible-based Christianity, I wouldn't believe in yours, because you're an asshole.
Now go on arguing the factuality of your bible stories.
So again by that declaration you determine 'truth' by judging the person delivering the narrative, rather than by content.
I can't believe anyone alive would ever admit to being so easily manipulated. In otherwords you and people like you can be taught what to think by the way of a carrot and stick. Give the facts you want people to run from to the guy with the stick/asshole attitude No matter what it is and like sheep you will run from it..
and likewise give the the facts of the message/propaganda to the guy with the carrot/good attitude and lemmings people like you will flock to them, no matter how far off base that information is.
Wow, I am just the oppsite. I don't care if a douche bag or someone I like is providing a message I take the message, vet it myself and make a judgement on content alone. For me the messenger is just the envelope the message comes in. One has nothing to do with the other, EVER.
