RE: It's Always Sunny - evolution versus Christianity
February 24, 2016 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2016 at 3:28 pm by Huggy Bear.)
Since you bailed, I'm only going to address a couple of points.
No, that's exactly the point I've been making this whole time, it's just worded differently.
I guess you missed the part in my post where it stated:
The original report.
About George J. Lacey
http://www.asqde.org/about/presidents/lacy_g.html
About the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_S..._Examiners
I find it interesting how YOU'RE quick to dismiss scientific evidence when it doesn't adhere to your world view.
This shows that you're really not all that different from the "creatards" you despise.
(February 23, 2016 at 1:25 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(February 22, 2016 at 11:50 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Im not saying that a theory isn't based on facts, I'm saying that the facts can be misinterpreted. Do you agree or disagree?
That's not what you said, it's what you are saying now. You've created a circle that you think is going to get you to, "evolution might be wrong" but it won't.
No, that's exactly the point I've been making this whole time, it's just worded differently.
(February 18, 2016 at 2:52 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: However an INFORMED opinion, one based on facts, is subject to change in light of new evidence.
Got it?
(February 23, 2016 at 1:25 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: LMFAO, are you serious?! I didn't think it could get any worse than that Christian Doctor Phil video you showed be, but wow. You have outdone your self. No Huggy, videos and pictures are not in any stretch of anyone's wildest imagination the "epitome" of scientific evidence. So, you must believe in Big Foot and Loch Ness too then, if these are your standards for good evidence? Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trials are considered the “Gold Standard," and you will not be able to produce even one in support of any of your claims. I actually laughed out loud at this one, thank you.
I guess you missed the part in my post where it stated:
Quote:George J. Lacy, Investigator of Questioned Documents, and often hired by the FBI in that capacity, subjected the negative to every scientific test available. At a news conference, he stated, “To my knowledge, this is the first time in all the world’s history that a supernatural being has been photographed and scientifically vindicated.”So the picture has been indeed scientifically verified.
The original report.
About George J. Lacey
http://www.asqde.org/about/presidents/lacy_g.html
Quote:George Lacy was the fifth president of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners and the last of the 15 men who established the organization to be elected to that office.
Mr. Lacy's first meeting was the 1942 inaugural meeting of the society. Two years later he married Lucile Peters Lacy who would later become the tenth president of the ASQDE.
During Mr. Lacy's early work in law enforcement he arrested Charles Ponzi, the namesake of the Ponzi Scheme. He began his career in forensic science as a general criminalist and ballistics expert. As a ballistics expert, he worked on the Bonnie and Clyde case. He later specialized in questioned document examination. He was responsible for establishing the Houston Police Crime Laboratory. Mr. Lacy maintained a private practice in Houston, Texas for many years.
About the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_S..._Examiners
Quote:The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners is the world's oldest society dedicated to the forensic science of questioned document examination with 144 members worldwide.
I find it interesting how YOU'RE quick to dismiss scientific evidence when it doesn't adhere to your world view.
This shows that you're really not all that different from the "creatards" you despise.