A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea

[Drich]

What is their to get these are your words sport:

Even if I believed in bible-based Christianity, I wouldn't believe in yours, because you're an asshole.

Again sport your words.

If you believe "X" is true and I teach "X" you would not believe "X" because I taught it. No other reason has been listed here other than you personally do not like me for your objection of "X".

If this is the case than everything I said in the above quote is valid.

I think you don't quite understand the depth in which you have committed yourself to in your statement, and when I spell everything out you yourself said... Well, it's like you said. You don't care if it is true or not, you will not believe what I have to say simply because i said it. despite whether or not it is true.

No, sport.  I was actually quite clear.  I said that even if you proved to me that Noah's Ark is a historical fact, I still wouldn't believe in YOUR Christianity.

YOUR Christianity.  Get it?

nuuupe
Your moving the goal posts old sport, that intelectual dishonesty.
I added quote tags to the actual arguement I addressed in the above copy, and I will provide them here again:

Even if I believed in bible-based Christianity, I wouldn't believe in yours, because you're an asshole.

Do you see it? The proof of noah's ark and validation of the bible has been taken off the table. You made the statement If you believed in "X" and I taught "X" you would not believe what I taught, the only reason stated was because "You are an ass hole." to go back on what I quoted and change the parameters of the discussion is a dishonesty.

There's more to Christianity than the historicity of your bible stories.  There's something called fruits of the spirit.  These are the characteristics of your God that are supposedly apparent in those who are indwelled by the Holy Spirit, which is a product of being born again. 

See, sport, my mind is completely open to facts and evidence.  I'm perfectly willing to consider your evidence for Noah's flood, Samson killing whole armies with jawbones, Ezekiel ascending to heaven in a flaming chariot or whatever.  I'm just not willing to look past the preponderance of evidence for your assholery to believe that your fairy tale beliefs have been of any real benefit to you.

but again BCB (Big cry baby) You specifically stated then even if you already believed what i believed you would not believe anything I said. which means your measure of truth is based on the 'feelings' you have for the individual providing the narrative.