A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea

[Old Baby]

No, sport.  I was actually quite clear.  I said that even if you proved to me that Noah's Ark is a historical fact, I still wouldn't believe in YOUR Christianity.

YOUR Christianity.  Get it?

nuuupe
Your moving the goal posts old sport, that intelectual dishonesty.
I added quote tags to the actual arguement I addressed in the above copy, and I will provide them here again:

Even if I believed in bible-based Christianity, I wouldn't believe in yours, because you're an asshole.

Do you see it? The proof of noah's ark and validation of the bible has been taken off the table. You made the statement If you believed in "X" and I taught "X" you would not believe what I taught, the only reason stated was because "You are an ass hole." to go back on what I quoted and change the parameters of the discussion is a dishonesty.

There's more to Christianity than the historicity of your bible stories.  There's something called fruits of the spirit.  These are the characteristics of your God that are supposedly apparent in those who are indwelled by the Holy Spirit, which is a product of being born again. 

See, sport, my mind is completely open to facts and evidence.  I'm perfectly willing to consider your evidence for Noah's flood, Samson killing whole armies with jawbones, Ezekiel ascending to heaven in a flaming chariot or whatever.  I'm just not willing to look past the preponderance of evidence for your assholery to believe that your fairy tale beliefs have been of any real benefit to you.

but again BCB (Big cry baby) You specifically stated then even if you already believed what i believed you would not believe anything I said. which means your measure of truth is based on the 'feelings' you have for the individual providing the narrative.

LOL... wow.  Typical, the only way to get around the argument is to construct a huge transparent strawman.  That's deliciously weak.

Reiterating for my own enjoyment.  I was commenting on YOUR Christianity, meaning the authenticity of your Christian born-again experience given the evidence of your rampant assholery, not on the historicity of your claims.  The historicity is beside the point, hence the statement that even if I believed in bible-based Christianity, I wouldn't believe in yours. 

Spin that you fuckwad.

Call me crybaby some more.  I laugh.  You lose.