(February 24, 2016 at 10:14 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: AHHHHHHH! Huggy, that examination was completed in the fucking FIFTIES! By one person!
And Charles Darwin published his theory on evolution in 1859; whats your point? are you saying all scientific research done before 1950 is unreliable?
(February 24, 2016 at 10:14 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: And there is exactly ZERO information about the damn picture from a reliable source since then! No, Branham's website doesn't count. I mean, for all the bitching and moaning you did over talkorigins.org, you are going to show me a picture of a glowing penis and try to say you have "proof" that it was God? Or Angels? What the fuck?!
There is a reason I included that scripture in the bible where it described "tongues of fire" hanging over people heads... That is a picture of the same phenomenon.
(February 24, 2016 at 10:18 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Not to mention the fact that Lacy never concluded that it was a picture of anything supernatural. It says right there in the "opinion" section that he believes it was light. How you get from "it was light," to "it was God" is beyond retarded.What he concluded was that there had to be a light in that position to form an image on the negative, I don't know about you but I don't think lights hanging over people heads out of nowhere is a naturally occurring phenomenon; And something that can't be explained using the laws of nature by definition is supernatural.