A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea

[Old Baby]

That's some truly mind-blowing rationale, Drich.  I used to think that I was a fundamentalist believer, but your degree of self-delusion is beyond anything that I could have ever justified.  I've read and studied the gospels many times, and I never interpreted them as giving me license to be a douchebag, or I should say Drich-bag, because I wouldn't want to do douchebags a disservice.  What this underscores for me is the predictable dishonesty of faith-based people.  Since you're not grounded in any sense of material reality to hold you accountable, you can use your holy scriptures to create this elaborate make-believe world that conveniently centers around you and caters to your sickness.  

Also, don't even suggest that I abandoned some kind of scientific attack for name calling.  I started with name calling.  I'm not a scientist, and I doubt you are either.  No one is going to be impressed with how skillfully you can parrot Ken Ham.  This is not a serious discussion for anyone but you.  Also, you're a fuckhole.

In fairness to Drich, he's not a YEC so the Ken Ham thing completely misses the mark.

That's fine.  I admit that I'm not caught up on Drich's scholarly writings.  Substitute "Ken Ham" for "creationist of some fucking kind".