Trump could win.
Will he win? Most likely not.
Bernie is doing MUCH better nationally however, in match-ups for the general election.
The scary thing with Hillary is that people don't realize the magnitude of the email scandal. She is currently being investigated and the FBI is deciding whether or not a criminal act was committed, and just today they gave an immunity deal to a staffer who previously pled the fifth in trial, so that he could give a full description. If you don't think Trump is going to use this as ammunition in the general election, you're dead fucking wrong. Trump will go all fucking out if it comes to it. He doesn't care. Anything he can use against her he will. The ongoing investigation looks bad enough but can you imagine if during the general election the investigation actually led to the conclusion that there WAS a criminal act committed? It would be a catastrophe of biblical proportions for the democratic party.
Now to be fair, Trump is also being put on trial for his involvement and advertising of "Trump University". He's being tried for the supposed "university" being fraudulent and giving false promises. It was advertised as somewhat of a university, but directly said things like it could make people "Business geniuses", and other preposterous claims. Regardless of how stupid people are to believe it would actually follow through, it's a crime to give false promises for profit in the manner that he did. The "Students" essentially ended up shelling out $15,000 for an hour long seminar taught by morons shouting "You've gotta invest in this, buy down, sell up" etc. Funniest part being that Trump wasn't even at the event. As well they would put booths around the exits, and stop each student before they leave and pester them as long as possible with opportunities to pay more money and go to more seminars before letting them leave.
Each candidate has incredibly sketchy investigations/legal fiascoes active at the moment. Both of these investigations are a huge added wild card for both sides, and if either one amounted to anything substantial it could mean inadvertently swaying the entire election to one party or another sheerly by outside influences.
You probably know my political bias would be toward Bernie, and it's okay, i'll happily admit that. Problem with the media now a-days is that they pretend to be objective in their analysis of the candidates, whilst pushing an extremely biased agenda to further their own subjective political opinions. At least I can have the self-awareness and honesty to admit I am biased toward one candidate. I am saying this because based on all I just described I think that if Bernie took nomination he could win the election with even more ease than polls already portray him as having. He has an incredibly clean record, and doesn't have these outside influences that could potentially disrupt, or change the election entirely like some of the current candidates do, which means he would not only win as described by general election match-up polls, but there is more stability in the claim of him beating the other candidates in the general election because there are less outlying factors with the ability to change his favorability among the american peoples.
That's my analysis. Sorry if some of it didn't pertain to the question.
Will he win? Most likely not.
Bernie is doing MUCH better nationally however, in match-ups for the general election.
The scary thing with Hillary is that people don't realize the magnitude of the email scandal. She is currently being investigated and the FBI is deciding whether or not a criminal act was committed, and just today they gave an immunity deal to a staffer who previously pled the fifth in trial, so that he could give a full description. If you don't think Trump is going to use this as ammunition in the general election, you're dead fucking wrong. Trump will go all fucking out if it comes to it. He doesn't care. Anything he can use against her he will. The ongoing investigation looks bad enough but can you imagine if during the general election the investigation actually led to the conclusion that there WAS a criminal act committed? It would be a catastrophe of biblical proportions for the democratic party.
Now to be fair, Trump is also being put on trial for his involvement and advertising of "Trump University". He's being tried for the supposed "university" being fraudulent and giving false promises. It was advertised as somewhat of a university, but directly said things like it could make people "Business geniuses", and other preposterous claims. Regardless of how stupid people are to believe it would actually follow through, it's a crime to give false promises for profit in the manner that he did. The "Students" essentially ended up shelling out $15,000 for an hour long seminar taught by morons shouting "You've gotta invest in this, buy down, sell up" etc. Funniest part being that Trump wasn't even at the event. As well they would put booths around the exits, and stop each student before they leave and pester them as long as possible with opportunities to pay more money and go to more seminars before letting them leave.
Each candidate has incredibly sketchy investigations/legal fiascoes active at the moment. Both of these investigations are a huge added wild card for both sides, and if either one amounted to anything substantial it could mean inadvertently swaying the entire election to one party or another sheerly by outside influences.
You probably know my political bias would be toward Bernie, and it's okay, i'll happily admit that. Problem with the media now a-days is that they pretend to be objective in their analysis of the candidates, whilst pushing an extremely biased agenda to further their own subjective political opinions. At least I can have the self-awareness and honesty to admit I am biased toward one candidate. I am saying this because based on all I just described I think that if Bernie took nomination he could win the election with even more ease than polls already portray him as having. He has an incredibly clean record, and doesn't have these outside influences that could potentially disrupt, or change the election entirely like some of the current candidates do, which means he would not only win as described by general election match-up polls, but there is more stability in the claim of him beating the other candidates in the general election because there are less outlying factors with the ability to change his favorability among the american peoples.
That's my analysis. Sorry if some of it didn't pertain to the question.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
