I'm not sure of the reasonableness of asking for 'evidence for God'. In the case of the God of Abraham, this is a non-evidentiary Being, whose existence is to be taken as a matter of faith (see Douglas Adams). And the answers you're likely to get are going to be absurdist in the extreme ('Everything is evidence for God' or 'Lots of people believe in God, so there's your evidence').
Better questions might be:
1) 'Is there anything - a phenomenon, a process, anything at all - for which God is the only possible explanation?'
2) 'Can you present a convincing argument for the existence of God?'
These are likely better questions, because they bring theists closer to what the rest of us call 'thinking', and it's fun to watch their faces go all red with the effort.
Boru
Better questions might be:
1) 'Is there anything - a phenomenon, a process, anything at all - for which God is the only possible explanation?'
2) 'Can you present a convincing argument for the existence of God?'
These are likely better questions, because they bring theists closer to what the rest of us call 'thinking', and it's fun to watch their faces go all red with the effort.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
