If there were fewer redundant charities, methinks it might be feasible/possible to have charity execs almost exclusively drawn from the pool of folks that don't need the income. (and therefore don't get paid) I know people on disability (for physical work) that would be highly capable in an administrative role, and changing the requirements on the disability programs to allow them to work for charitable orgs in functions not relevant to their disability sans wages, would eliminate the set of folks looking to get rich. I'd think some of the less odious 'trust funders' would be fine too, especially the ones that are not pissing away their $$$.
Lottery winners, spouses in similar circumstances to that divorced woman I know (financially set for life courtesy of her rich philandering bastard hubby), retirees from (successful) businesses. There's probably other groups too.
Hell, I'm on a couple boards, don't take $$$ for my legit expenses, and donate my time and money. the # of charities should be tailored to the # of folks able to manage them sans salary/expense accounts.
Lottery winners, spouses in similar circumstances to that divorced woman I know (financially set for life courtesy of her rich philandering bastard hubby), retirees from (successful) businesses. There's probably other groups too.
Hell, I'm on a couple boards, don't take $$$ for my legit expenses, and donate my time and money. the # of charities should be tailored to the # of folks able to manage them sans salary/expense accounts.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
