Aside from your brining pragmatism into it, which is entirely different from epistemic justification, it works quite well.
You would say you believe in God because it is the explanation that is most likely true given the evidence? Or do you only believe after pragmatism is taken into account?
You would say you believe in God because it is the explanation that is most likely true given the evidence? Or do you only believe after pragmatism is taken into account?
.