(March 13, 2016 at 4:05 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(March 13, 2016 at 3:27 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm guessing the pious fuck didn't know that story was a forgery added centuries later, huh?Do you always just choose from information which fits your narrative?
http://garthright.blogspot.com/2014/02/f...hrman.html
You claim (on multiple occasions) that Jesus never existed:
(January 27, 2016 at 11:21 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Read Richard Carrier's "On The Historicity of Jesus" and find out how wrong you are.(July 15, 2015 at 7:21 pm)Minimalist Wrote: No way.Yet I see you referencing Bart Ehrman to prove your point. You do realize that according to Ehrman, Jesus did in fact exist?
http://www.bartdehrman.com/did-jesus-exist/
Quote:In Did Jesus Exist? historian and Bible expert Bart Ehrman confronts these questions, vigorously defends the historicity of Jesus, and provides a compelling portrait of the man from Nazareth. The Jesus you discover here may not be the Jesus you had hoped to meet—but he did exist, whether we like it or not.
Since you CLEARLY disagree with Ehrman on whether or not Jesus existed, Why do you all of the sudden agree with him in this case?
Because unlike fucktards like you, the manuscript evidence that this happy horseshit was not in the earliest copies of your fucking bible is irrefutable.
Got it now, dickhead?
