Keep in mind: This thread is the same as asserting a necessity to spread further irrationalism.
The masses would be forwarned to check this sticky out. It serves only the above purpose, irrationalism supporting irrationalism is all it is. So I suppose to pose the question of why you atheists support it would be entirely relevant? Why not after all? It is you who is spreading the nonsense. Do you also suppose the nonsense? Or would it be argued that you defy the nonsense? That would be the most severe case: "The case for total irrationalism"
The masses would be forwarned to check this sticky out. It serves only the above purpose, irrationalism supporting irrationalism is all it is. So I suppose to pose the question of why you atheists support it would be entirely relevant? Why not after all? It is you who is spreading the nonsense. Do you also suppose the nonsense? Or would it be argued that you defy the nonsense? That would be the most severe case: "The case for total irrationalism"