Theist "You are Evidence" argument.

[Esquilax]

All am saying is, especially when discussing the presence/absence of evidence for something, it is best to keep an open mind and take into account the very real possibility that we don't really know everything that there is to know about the topic. This is how human knowledge increases and progresses further. And that's how true objective science is made. Child-like inside-the-box arrogance gets you no where.

I do have an open mind: if evidence shows that there's something new to know about the subject, I'll amend my views to encompass that new knowledge. I will change my views to fit the evidence, every time. What I won't do is seriously entertain unevidenced claims about a subject just because it'd be really convenient for someone elses' position, least of all because they'll call me arrogant if I don't.