(March 24, 2016 at 10:24 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote: Federal Court Rules You Have No Constitutional Right to Engage in 100% Consensual Rough Sex
What does this mean?
"Thus, as inCruzan and Glucksberg, a legislative restriction on BDSM activity is justifiable by reference to the state’s interest in the protection of vulnerable persons"
So... this just means that someone can now legislate about this in order to make it illegal to engage in BDSM activities?