RE: His throne is on water..stunning scientific theory that the Quran foretold 1400 y ago
March 26, 2016 at 7:52 am
(March 25, 2016 at 9:26 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(March 24, 2016 at 7:46 pm)Jenny A Wrote: So if the super fluid hypothesis turns out to be wrong, you'll admit the Koran is fundamentally flawed and Allah was not the prophet of god?
...
FebruaryOfReason
It usually doesn't matter, because if a person don't want believe, they won't even if they saw all the signs.
Whereas if you want to believe, you'll ignore any facts that contradict what you believe, and take the flimsiest "evidence" as proof that what you want to believe is true.
For example, 1 word in a 1400 year old book is the same as 1 word in a newly developed and as-yet-unproven theory. So you immediately start a topic saying "This confirms the Koran is right".
But as Jenny A says, if the theory is refuted, you will start precisely 0 topics saying "This suggests the Koran is wrong".
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
