RE: Trump versus Clinton?
April 1, 2016 at 6:13 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2016 at 6:27 pm by scoobysnack.)
(April 1, 2016 at 6:08 pm)abaris Wrote: As with so many things in life, I don't find any kinder words for you as calling you a conspiracy nut.
As opposed to many, I have a pretty solid grip on what the media is about, since after university, I went into journalism and PR. I'm very critical of my sources and the people behind them. Breitbart, Alex Jones and company, can't even be called sources. They're propaganda at it's purest. I've checked my share of their stories against numerous other sources. None of them stood up to closer scrutiny.
Jones is either a very clever businessman, feeding on nutters like you, or he's just as delusional and covered in tinfoil from head to toe. Oh, and look up his biography, if you find the time. Apart from being an obscure religious fanatic, he also has ties to neonazi organisations. The latter isn't entirely confirmed, but there's enough evidence to make a case. The former is by his own admission.
Yet you still don't address the message of the person interviewed, you address the interviewer. You seems to be a victim of the propaganda yourself. How is it that you have been trained to be misled? Neo-Nazi organizations hate him for not focusing on what they say is the Jewish control, so I don't know what you are trying to push. It seems you have been misled, or perhaps a useful idiot.
Anyway, your opinion is not valid, because you have never posted anything worth reading, it's just a tactic to get people off the trail. And you still will not answer the question on your nationality. Mainly because you repeat media talking points proves you are a shill.
At the same time I'll let you counter point with sources, but it always seems you don't have a counterpoint beyond disbelief because your trusted sources don't cover certain subjects. I'd like to have to start posting links, instead of opinions so I can check up on where you are getting your information from.