(April 5, 2016 at 1:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 5, 2016 at 1:02 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Did you read the whole thing? I would also say, that without proof does apply to each of my statements above, however without reason does not.
I also apologize, I screwed up in answering your question. You had stated "no evidence" and I asked about the evidence. The answer is no.... however I think that you are also redefining evidence. If the evidence is the word of one person... probably not.
Are you responding to me, or min here? So, it's a numbers issue? How many people would have to corroborate my claim about the two headed dinosaur in order for you to believe it without any other evidence?
Just to clarify...when I say evidence I mean it in a scientific sense; demonstrable, repeatable, testable...ect, and personal testimony falls pretty low on the ladder there.
There are a number of factors that come into play.... if you want to present your evidence go ahead.
Well according to your criteria, apparently I would have to do some demonstrable, repeatable, testable sciencey type thing on the dinosaur. And so would everyone else, who is to believe it.
