"all they say is blubbering about Darwin's evolution of the specie"
Really, dude? First of all, all Darwin discovered was the principle of Natural Selection. Evolution itself was known in the time of Darwin's grandfather; they simply had the wrong ideas about what drove it... the full picture wouldn't be completed until the Modern Synthesis of the 1930s, which combined Mendel's discoveries about genetics with the information provided by other scientists, including Darwin.
And you're forgetting that both atheist and religious scientists all (with a fraction of a fraction of a percent exception) agree with the Theory of Evolution. It's not an atheism thing; we simply have no reason to rejection evolution based on doctrinal prejudices.
It's amazing to me the depth of utter delusion "magical thinkers" are capable of demonstrating.
Really, dude? First of all, all Darwin discovered was the principle of Natural Selection. Evolution itself was known in the time of Darwin's grandfather; they simply had the wrong ideas about what drove it... the full picture wouldn't be completed until the Modern Synthesis of the 1930s, which combined Mendel's discoveries about genetics with the information provided by other scientists, including Darwin.
And you're forgetting that both atheist and religious scientists all (with a fraction of a fraction of a percent exception) agree with the Theory of Evolution. It's not an atheism thing; we simply have no reason to rejection evolution based on doctrinal prejudices.
It's amazing to me the depth of utter delusion "magical thinkers" are capable of demonstrating.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
