Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 16, 2025, 5:34 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A response to "upping the ante" on pascals wager
#19
RE: A response to "upping the ante" on pascals wager
(April 5, 2016 at 10:20 am)Won2blv Wrote: (I'm starting this thread in response to another thread. I don't know the exact rules on doing this so I'll vaguely reference it, but it should be clear which one it is)

On another thread a point has been made that since Jesus told an individual that he need to sell all his belongings and give to the poor, if any christian even owns a tv they are living in perpetual sin. And that it couldn't hurt their chances of getting to heaven.

Lets assume this is true. Does this mean mean that if all atheist lived by Jesus words it wouldn't hurt? Let me explain, using the said account of Jesus, maybe this wouldn't inspire an atheist to truly give all of his belongings but what if this scripture inspired them to give a donation to a homeless shelter? Or donate clothes? Or maybe give money to refugees in Syria?

If you are an atheist that believes in humanism, does this prove that living by christ's standards, even if you can't fully live up to it, is it better for you and humanity? Does this prove that living as a christian is the best for the world?

I don't believe the answer to those questions is yes. I believe humans can do good to humans for the sake of humanity. But if an atheist makes a point that christian don't live up to christs standards, what is the point that you're making? That christs standards are supreme? Or that we're all just selfish, and this proves that Jesus words aren't worth noting? Or something else? I just don't understand the point that is being made

No, when I make that point I am pointing out either cherry-picking or hypocrisy, as well as some of that mote/beam thing when my interlocutor is an obnoxious preacher.

I don't, however, speak for any other atheist. My uplink to the Hive Mind failed last week and IT has been terribly slow getting to my work order.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: A response to "upping the ante" on pascals wager - by Thumpalumpacus - April 11, 2016 at 6:55 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Problem with Pascal's Wager Rhondazvous 45 10023 May 11, 2018 at 7:27 am
Last Post: brewer
  Atheist version of Pascal's wager Nihilist Virus 57 14534 February 4, 2016 at 3:07 pm
Last Post: RobbyPants
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 47546 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Response to a Catholic tjakey 21 7682 September 22, 2015 at 6:15 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Smile I Need A Sincere Christian Response Please ShaMan 58 16759 August 1, 2014 at 3:27 pm
Last Post: orangebox21
  A wonderful response to biblical objections to homosexuality. Esquilax 22 8434 January 20, 2014 at 2:34 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  Response? searchingforanswers 11 2930 September 21, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A Response To: A Book of Contradictions Hunted By A Freak 7 3061 May 18, 2011 at 3:44 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Reverse Pascals Wager Captain Scarlet 62 20152 August 24, 2010 at 3:17 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)