(April 12, 2016 at 12:01 am)Goosebump Wrote:10^120 doesn't mean 'Biblical God', it means an inference to the best explanation: choice between 'chance' or 'directed'. Dawkins - gives a 10^120 explanation. Poor guy has developed a fuzzy brain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4E_bT4ecgk.(April 11, 2016 at 11:50 pm)snowtracks Wrote: Scientific Method yielded the following -
The universe's expansion rate has been balanced at just the right rate to make advanced life possible. if the expansion rate were to rapid, stars and planets would not form since gravity wouldn't have adequate time to pull together the gases and dust that make up these bodies. If the expansion rate weren't rapid enough, the stars formed would rapidly collapse and become black holes or neutron stars. What determines this expansion rate is gravity and dark energy (a property that stretches the universe's space/time surface.
In the book 'The Grand Design' by Hawking, Modinow, of which I have in eBook form, in chapter 7 this statement is made.
"the laws of nature form a system that is extremely fine-tuned, and very little in physical law can be altered without the possibility of the development of life as we know it".
Goes on to say that the Cosmological Constant (the energy density that causes the universe's expansion, referred to as dark energy) has a value 10^120” (as a comparison, the est. atoms in the observable universe is 10^80)
--- http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how...e+universe ---
Continuing "the one thing that is certain is that if the value of the Cosmological Constant were much larger than it is, our universe would have blown itself apart before galaxies could form--once again--life as we know it would impossible".
The sample size is one (scientific); the multiverse is hypothetical set of finite and infinite possible universes. So there it is, the scientific method rules out chance.
*** emphasis mine ***
I put in some line breaks in the above quote to make it a little more legible. Just in case anybody that want's to know why I said what I'm about to say wants to read it.
In bold above you say: "So there it is, the scientific method rules out chance."
Just to be clear, No it didn't. And nothing you posted does either.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.