(April 16, 2016 at 8:45 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote:That's not exactly what I had hoped to convey. An intersubjective stance cannot establish itself as the undeniably correct position, either, and infact leaves itself open to the same inconsistency found in all forms of relativism: "The only absolute truth is there are no absolute truths." While the belief in objectivity is just that, a belief, it is at the very least a self-consistent one.(April 16, 2016 at 7:27 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Any other definition undermines the notion of true objectivity. At best all that remains is intersubjectivity. In my opinion that approach severs the relationship between first principles and external reality.Then again, if intersubjectivity best describes the best we can do, then your notion of true objectivity would actually be false.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 27, 2024, 4:39 pm
Thread Rating:
What would you consider to be evidence for God?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)