RE: please refute these verses of Quran (or at least their interpretations)?
April 20, 2016 at 8:05 pm
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2016 at 8:08 pm by Simon Moon.)
What is there to refute?
This is standard post hoc rationalisation. Forcing ignorant religious texts to try to fit modern scientific discoveries.
Here is a post on a different forum from a Hindu with a list of the passages in the Hindu religious texts that are equally "impressive" as those in the Quran. I'll bet Zakir Naik wouldn't accept them as proof for the Hindu god, right?
http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/s...see.84199/
This is standard post hoc rationalisation. Forcing ignorant religious texts to try to fit modern scientific discoveries.
Here is a post on a different forum from a Hindu with a list of the passages in the Hindu religious texts that are equally "impressive" as those in the Quran. I'll bet Zakir Naik wouldn't accept them as proof for the Hindu god, right?
http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/s...see.84199/
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
