RE: Can anyone please refute these verses of Quran (or at least their interpretations)?
April 24, 2016 at 8:29 am
(April 24, 2016 at 1:42 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: I can't prove God, but the problem is about our standards; to me the universe is an enough of an evidence, to you that evidence that I'm putting forward is not enough; so you see it's kinda of... an infinite cycle?
You know -just like me- what the end of this discussion is: I'm taking a leap of faith that you don't wanna take, so the conclusion of this debate is that we agree to disagree kinda thing..
I can't prove leprechauns, but to me rainbows are enough evidence. Rainbows appear all of time so leprechauns must exist because they are found near rainbows. And I'd really like that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. So, it makes sense for me to believe leprechauns exist. If I didn't believe that they existed then what hope do I have of finding that elusive pot of gold? I wouldn't bother looking for it. I'm just taking a leap of faith in the hope of finding the gold.
If you don't believe leprechauns exist it doesn't matter because I just said I can't prove that they exist. But we both know, really, that there is no pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. Rainbows are actually circular, so they have no end, you just can't see the full circle from the ground. Hopefully this explains my contention. So why should Allah be treated different from leprechauns?
The universe exiting doesn't point to any specific deity. Yes, you want to demonstrate the Quran is a reliable source of information - which you are trying to do. I am curious about this Egyptian Hieroglyphs things, so maybe you can expand on that (I think you mentioned it before).
