(April 23, 2016 at 10:42 am)Jehanne Wrote:(April 23, 2016 at 9:45 am)Drich Wrote: What are you talking about Luke (of the book of Luke and Acts) is Paul's understudy. (we know this because Luke Himself places himself as a disciple of Paul in the book of Acts.) Luke knew nothing of Christ, as he was a servant to a man many think lived in Rome at the time of Christ. to write a gospel of Jesus means Luke studied under someone who knew Jesus was God. That would be Paul. In essence Luke's Gospel is the Gospel of Paul.
Most scholars do not hold to this view:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_...p_and_date
cute effort but no.
What you did there was not provide 'what most scholars view' you provided what one wiki page had to say.
There are two basic views held by scholars. The traditional view and the Critical view. Even in most innerations of the critical view authorship of both the book of luke and Acts is attributed to the same author. As the book of acts speaks from an eye witness perspective the point I made stands.
