(April 26, 2016 at 11:02 am)Little Rik Wrote:(April 26, 2016 at 10:33 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Are you trying to imply that you are expert and intelligent? Regardless, intelligence is no immunity to error. So in addition to continuing to fail to provide a reason for preferring the old to the new, you've just introduced some irrelevant twaddle that happens to be wrong. Seriously, are you really asserting that your judgement in the matter is infallible? I don't think so. Provide a sound reason for preferring the original to newer instances in music or words, or GTFO.
Yog you keep on banging the head on the wall.![]()
If the new give us hatred, wars, famine, climate change more diseases and God knows what else then
it clearly means that we are on the wrong track.
The message is clear.![]()
You vandalize the good things and you get only more and more problems.
The old was just as responsible for wars, famine, and all measure of human cruelty. You're spinning your wheels and making no headway in showing how the old in music or words was better than the new. Besides, I defy you to show that new meanings for words and new music are responsible for the things you claim they are responsible for. Correlation doesn't equal causation and correlation is all you've got. You're just spewing irrelevant tripe.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)