RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 5:03 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 5:06 am by robvalue.)
We need to know what god is, not what he is not.
If you don't know what he is, how do you expect to convince us it's anything real? It doesn't matter what other people say it is, what do you say it is?
If you're saying he's "untestable" then you are done. It's an unfalsifiable proposition and therefor of no practical use. If we cannot figure him out, that includes you.
Everything you've written above looks much like a generic deistic God, what does it have to do with a storybook character?
If you don't know what he is, how do you expect to convince us it's anything real? It doesn't matter what other people say it is, what do you say it is?
If you're saying he's "untestable" then you are done. It's an unfalsifiable proposition and therefor of no practical use. If we cannot figure him out, that includes you.
Everything you've written above looks much like a generic deistic God, what does it have to do with a storybook character?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum