Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 23, 2024, 7:36 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
The nature of evidence

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The nature of evidence
robvalue Offline
Chainsaw of logic
*****
Religious Views: Time to wake up
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation: 155
#37
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 3:01 pm (This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 3:06 pm by robvalue.)
I don't even know what "testimony of evidence" is supposed to mean.

You guys explained about anecdotes well for me, thank you Smile

An anecdote (describing an incident) lives and dies entirely on (a) the person telling the truth and (b) the person correctly interpreting everything, just as they describe. This is incredibly weak evidence. It's not observable, repeatable or verifiable.

More importantly, you're never going to convince a sceptic of anything (except the mundane) based on such "evidence". Ever. Trying to pretend it's more than it is just wastes everyone's time.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
The nature of evidence

Messages In This Thread
The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 1, 2016 at 8:19 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 1, 2016 at 9:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 1, 2016 at 9:08 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 1, 2016 at 9:20 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 1, 2016 at 9:30 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 1, 2016 at 10:49 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 1, 2016 at 10:55 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Minimalist - May 1, 2016 at 11:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 3:12 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 2, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 2, 2016 at 12:41 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 12:49 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 3:54 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 4:23 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 4:35 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 4:59 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 5:00 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ravenshire - May 2, 2016 at 4:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 2, 2016 at 6:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 5:03 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 6:00 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 7:55 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Alex K - May 2, 2016 at 6:07 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mudhammam - May 2, 2016 at 6:24 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Alex K - May 2, 2016 at 6:38 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mudhammam - May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 6:27 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mudhammam - May 4, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 12:28 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 3:51 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 8:00 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 8:20 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 3:52 pm
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 8:26 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 8:29 am
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 8:36 am
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 12:45 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 2, 2016 at 12:46 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Joods - May 2, 2016 at 1:01 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 3:01 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 3:28 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 6:06 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 6:43 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 2, 2016 at 7:46 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 2, 2016 at 7:52 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 9:35 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ravenshire - May 3, 2016 at 10:18 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 10:46 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 8:20 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 2, 2016 at 8:48 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Minimalist - May 2, 2016 at 3:35 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Minimalist - May 2, 2016 at 3:59 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 4:07 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by brewer - May 2, 2016 at 4:08 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 2, 2016 at 6:07 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 6:50 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - May 2, 2016 at 7:13 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 2, 2016 at 8:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 3, 2016 at 4:47 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 3, 2016 at 11:05 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 3, 2016 at 12:14 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Pat Mustard - May 5, 2016 at 2:19 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 2, 2016 at 7:59 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 2, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 10:51 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 11:25 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 1:35 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 1:41 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 1:49 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 1:57 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 3, 2016 at 1:53 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 3, 2016 at 1:53 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 1:57 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 2:05 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 2:14 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 2:21 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 2:27 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 2:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 2:37 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 4:57 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 3, 2016 at 8:30 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 3, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by abaris - May 3, 2016 at 1:24 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 3, 2016 at 3:48 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 7:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 10:25 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2016 at 11:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 3:55 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by The Valkyrie - May 3, 2016 at 3:56 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 3, 2016 at 6:18 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 3, 2016 at 7:28 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ravenshire - May 3, 2016 at 10:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 4, 2016 at 12:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 12:22 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 4, 2016 at 12:41 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 12:50 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by The Valkyrie - May 4, 2016 at 3:17 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Angrboda - May 4, 2016 at 4:58 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 4, 2016 at 8:25 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2016 at 11:38 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 5, 2016 at 12:10 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Pat Mustard - May 5, 2016 at 6:21 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 3, 2016 at 10:52 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 10:41 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Jackalope - May 4, 2016 at 11:10 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 12:00 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 4, 2016 at 1:10 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 10:15 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - May 3, 2016 at 7:49 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 3, 2016 at 9:10 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 3, 2016 at 11:12 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 9:25 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 4, 2016 at 11:07 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 10:31 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 3, 2016 at 10:16 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 2:15 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 4, 2016 at 2:17 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 2:23 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 2:34 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 4, 2016 at 3:10 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 3:24 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by The Valkyrie - May 4, 2016 at 7:05 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 4, 2016 at 7:35 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 11:16 am
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 4, 2016 at 12:24 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 12:47 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 12:49 pm
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 4, 2016 at 12:57 pm
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 4, 2016 at 1:00 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 1:04 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 4, 2016 at 1:01 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 4, 2016 at 1:09 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 1:15 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 3:33 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 4, 2016 at 9:22 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 5, 2016 at 2:34 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 5, 2016 at 8:18 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2016 at 12:18 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 5, 2016 at 12:44 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 5, 2016 at 2:06 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 5, 2016 at 3:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by abaris - May 5, 2016 at 5:38 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Pat Mustard - May 5, 2016 at 6:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ben Davis - May 5, 2016 at 5:26 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 5, 2016 at 8:22 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 6, 2016 at 5:53 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 6, 2016 at 6:21 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Video Neurosurgeon Provides Evidence Against Materialism Guard of Guardians 41 6044 June 17, 2019 at 10:40 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 14920 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Testimony is Evidence RoadRunner79 588 135670 September 13, 2017 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  The Nature Of Truth WisdomOfTheTrees 5 1239 February 21, 2017 at 5:30 am
Last Post: Sal
  The Dogma of Human Nature WisdomOfTheTrees 15 3034 February 8, 2017 at 7:40 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  Is the statement "Claims demand evidence" always true? Mudhammam 268 41962 February 3, 2017 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  Anecdotal Evidence RoadRunner79 395 66694 December 14, 2016 at 2:53 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 15702 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Witness Evidence RoadRunner79 248 43249 December 17, 2015 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence RoadRunner79 184 35224 November 13, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)