The nature of evidence

[robvalue]

This thread is yet another example of why I take the ignostic position.

Agnostic = "I don't know"

Ignostic = "I don't know what you're talking about"

We have a single theist, trying to make a claim, and even then the subject of the claim is completely unclear after all these pages. So imagine trying to assess the general claim of "god's existence"! How can I? I haven't a clue what people are talking about.

If they'd just say "an intelligent creator", then we can at least have a sensible discussion. But almost no one can stop there, they have to pile on all this other garbage. And not every theist will even agree to that part. They start calling the universe "God" and such.