RE: The nature of evidence
May 3, 2016 at 2:37 am
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2016 at 3:34 am by robvalue.)
Yeah. Or just ignorant of how arguments and evidence actually work. You can give people the benefit of the doubt of ignorance to begin with, but that excuse grows ever more thin the more times you explain the flaws.
But if you shift the focus and talk about something else, like them owing you a million bucks, suddenly their scepticism comes to life.
I've been challenged before to try and make a case, to pretend to be the theist. I can't do it. I'm so painfully aware of the necessity to include logical fallacies and obfuscation, and of the total lack of available evidence.
But if you shift the focus and talk about something else, like them owing you a million bucks, suddenly their scepticism comes to life.
I've been challenged before to try and make a case, to pretend to be the theist. I can't do it. I'm so painfully aware of the necessity to include logical fallacies and obfuscation, and of the total lack of available evidence.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum