RE: The nature of evidence
May 4, 2016 at 2:34 am
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2016 at 2:35 am by robvalue.)
One last thing before I go blow up some tanks:
If the nature of your claim is such that there cannot be any proper, convincing evidence for it, then that is a problem with the claim. That's not to say it isn't true, but it should make you stop and consider why you even believe it yourself.
It is not a problem with/for the person you're telling the claim to. Nor is it reasonable to expect them to believe it based on whatever extremely weak evidence you present, because your claim is "special".
If the nature of your claim is such that there cannot be any proper, convincing evidence for it, then that is a problem with the claim. That's not to say it isn't true, but it should make you stop and consider why you even believe it yourself.
It is not a problem with/for the person you're telling the claim to. Nor is it reasonable to expect them to believe it based on whatever extremely weak evidence you present, because your claim is "special".
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum