RE: Bernie Sanders for VP!
May 6, 2016 at 12:37 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2016 at 12:42 am by Sterben.)
(May 6, 2016 at 12:07 am)SteelCurtain Wrote:It would not bother me in anyway to have all female ticket, I'm talking about the masses here. We have come a long way in progression of American society, transgenders and gays have rights that have been long deserved. Woman have assumed powerful positions that were once only held men (CEO'S, congress, senators, mayors and other positions).(May 6, 2016 at 12:03 am)Sterben Wrote: I'm not being sexist ...
Says the person right before they say something sexist...
(May 6, 2016 at 12:03 am)Sterben Wrote: ...just saying that the country is not ready for a woman President and Vice-President just yet. Although, it might prove to be a very interesting social experiment. How would American voters react to a female President and a female VP ticket?
And there it is.
Social experiment? Really?!? What is the difference between a female and a male vice president? Why isn't the country 'ready' for an all female ticket?
To answer your question, it would be too soon for a all female ticket. Point One: there is still a lot of people who would view A all female ticket would be threatening to them. Point two: Hillery would need a male VP for the percentage of voters who are still somewhat traditional. Point Three: Dealing with non-progressive male world leaders, there is a lot of them out there that even female leaders like Angela Merkel has issues dealing with based on the fact there woman. The prospect of a all female ticket be great if the candidates were qualified. I did like your thoughts on Warren has a potential choice. This is a game of political chess, let's get a female president in office first so that way society can progress further, to the point to where a all female ticket would have a higher chance to succeed.