You still have not shown how two females on a ticket is any different than one female. You do realize we're talking liberals and moderates here, right? Why would an all female ticket be any more threatening than a female President? Those people who wouldn't vote for an all female ticket wouldn't vote for a female President in the first place. Those people are all squarely in the Trump camp. Point one and two are moot. The VP doesn't travel and do diplomacy, and Hillary was already Secretary of State, the nation's top diplomat, so that puts to rest point three.
The only downside with the liberal demographic and an all female ticket with the top candidates for Hillary's running mate is the lack of diversity. That's why Cory Booker would be perfect.
The only downside with the liberal demographic and an all female ticket with the top candidates for Hillary's running mate is the lack of diversity. That's why Cory Booker would be perfect.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
