RE: Bernie Sanders for VP!
May 6, 2016 at 6:38 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2016 at 6:41 pm by Sterben.)
(May 6, 2016 at 12:47 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: You still have not shown how two females on a ticket is any different than one female. You do realize we're talking liberals and moderates here, right? Why would an all female ticket be any more threatening than a female President? Those people who wouldn't vote for an all female ticket wouldn't vote for a female President in the first place. Those people are all squarely in the Trump camp. Point one and two are moot. The VP doesn't travel and do diplomacy, and Hillary was already Secretary of State, the nation's top diplomat, so that puts to rest point three.
The only downside with the liberal demographic and an all female ticket with the top candidates for Hillary's running mate is the lack of diversity. That's why Cory Booker would be perfect.
I do realize that were talking liberals and moderates, I know none of us not have a problem with a all female ticket. Your right about Cory Booker, he would add a good balance to the ticket. You also have account for the dems who don't like or trust Hillary; I know that I don't want see her in office, if it comes to Hillary and Trump a lot of people will be staying home. If we had a stronger third party option I'd be voting that way. That point aside, she needs more appeal to the national level. I'd would of loved to have seen a Sanders and Warren ticket, that would of been the perfect ticket. Clinton and Booker would be a good choice, on the other hand though if all we can muster is Hillary were in trouble as a country. Our best hope lye's in Sanders ability to kick it up and win the nomination. If he does not make it I'm staying home in November.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxsQ7jJJcEA
