(May 7, 2016 at 9:32 am)bennyboy Wrote: I was reading this:
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/04/health...index.html
And it got me to thinking. . . there must be a genetic pattern for a "toe," and then a counter of some type. So you could arbitrarily (I assume) program a DNA sequence to have any number of toes or fingers, and yet, magically, they "turn out." The baby's toes all look good, he's just got the wrong number of them.
In other words, the human body actually isn't completely represented in the DNA, but as a sequence of instructions ABOUT a human body-- for example, how many toes it should have.
Stuff to think about.
What makes you conclude that the body isn't represented in the DNA from the example you quote? Maybe you could also clarify what you mean by the Body being represented vs. having instructions about the body.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
