RE: About atheism
May 15, 2016 at 3:42 am
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2016 at 3:46 am by robvalue.)
*Sigh*
So, you mean sceptics. Just say sceptics. Atheism is irrelevant. Still. Atheism is the logical conclusions of scepticism, but not vice versa. Atheism is one tiny subset of the conclusions of scepticism.
Yes, those who wish to deal with reality on reality's terms and hold the most accurate beliefs possible are sceptics. If you're proud not to be one, then more power to you. You can go on talking about undemonstrated phenomena as if they are established facts.
This is my last effort to appeal to your sense of reason.
So, you mean sceptics. Just say sceptics. Atheism is irrelevant. Still. Atheism is the logical conclusions of scepticism, but not vice versa. Atheism is one tiny subset of the conclusions of scepticism.
Yes, those who wish to deal with reality on reality's terms and hold the most accurate beliefs possible are sceptics. If you're proud not to be one, then more power to you. You can go on talking about undemonstrated phenomena as if they are established facts.
This is my last effort to appeal to your sense of reason.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum