(May 18, 2016 at 11:06 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: There's another thing to consider here, and that's the actual purpose of the super-delegates. While they have never in history nominated a candidate against the will of the people, they were created to do exactly that. Super-delegates exist in the event that the party needs to vote down a popularly-selected candidate because they're not electable (like, say, if they're trailing the GOP candidate while the other contender is beating him, or if they get indicted by the FBI for breaching national security, for instance).
I do keep saying they'll go with whoever has the lead, but if that candidate can't win the election, they might not actually do that. They won't if they actually want to win in November, anyway. If Bernie continues to poll as a better contender against trump and keeps winning primaries, the supers may start to panic and switch sides even if he's not fully in the lead by the convention (as long as he keeps it close and continues winning elections). According to the numbers, Sanders has every reason to contend for the opportunity to run against Trump. On paper, he is by far the best candidate to do it, and he may be able to convince the supers of that depending on how things go between now and the DNC.
The way Sanders is winning states considering the obvious new your primary was rigged for hillary.
He has been on a streak lately getting states he is going to get the primary the way i see it hillary and the FBI
and other things not to mention the GOP attack ads against he will be the reason why she wont win teh primary.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>