(May 23, 2016 at 2:11 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(May 23, 2016 at 1:46 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: By taking your remarks about what you believe to be my prioritized concerns to their conclusion? -- Am I going to have to dissect your previous post?
Sure, go ahead. I don't think you reached the conclusion I had in mind, and I'll be happy to correct you in detail.
(May 23, 2016 at 1:46 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: I was talking specifically about the matter at hand, not generally. Being considerate is not the way to go if you can desensitize instead.
Oh, I'm sorry, I hadn't realized you've been appointed Chief Desensitizer for the Overly-Sensitive Idiots Department. Congratulations on the promotion.
(May 23, 2016 at 1:46 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: I graciously accept your subliminal apology.
More evidence of your ego outdoing your reading skills. I understand that English is not your first language, but you should clear up your confusion with questions, not incorrect assumptions.
Hope that helps!
You said I care more about linguistic purity than about human emotions. I referred synecdochically to those same emotions in an attempt to quicken the conversation in a direction it was eventually heading in anyway. Now, you're either backpedalling or you think feelings are either distinct from or less important than human wellbeing as a whole.
It's a thankless job, really.
Nothing to be confused about, I made a quip in order to both acknowledge and welcome your obvious change of heart (if small) concerning me.
My English is fine. Still bitter about our last interaction, Mr. Writer?