RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 24, 2016 at 1:16 pm
(May 24, 2016 at 1:11 pm)Losty Wrote:(May 24, 2016 at 12:32 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Isn't that what this means?:
Besides trolling, "hiding our IP addresses by using a proxy without adequate reason" seems to be a rule, now.
It's not, I know it's not. So this "rule" shouldn't be written there.
It seems that it's a rule to refuse to cooperate with the staff when you're being investigated for being a sock. I also don't like the way it's worded, but I consider that half the bans on the other forum I like look like this "SoandSo banned for being a dick". And I think at least it's nice they tell us why here and have no problem with us inquiring for more information in this thread.
I agree!

It's the words I'm having issue with.
It would be fine if SC had written something like what you suggested: "refused to cooperate with staff in sock-related investigation".
Or just left it at "troll".