(May 24, 2016 at 3:31 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:(May 24, 2016 at 12:10 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: That must have been too long of a ramble. Did you miss this part? I had to accept a salary that was $1200 per year lower than my male predecessor, and I had to have a Master's degree to be interviewed, (newly required for the position) when my predecessor only had a Bachelor's degree?
OK, but how did you rule out other factors? What if the city cut some library funding and simultaneously upped the requirements for that position? How did you establish a causal relationship between your gender and the new requirements/pay?
I didn't, Red. There could have been a lot of other factors - and I did tell Pool in a previous post that there had been funding problems. Gender was only a factor when I heard that they had not chosen any male applicants to interview, and I know that wouldn't stand up in a court of law. I don't think that they got many applicants because the pay was easily $10,000 below what the degree requirements would usually command, but . . . I needed a job.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein