(June 1, 2016 at 10:17 pm)Light of Truth Wrote: That doesn't make it objective. Why are we bound by evolutionary "morals?" That is still not objective morality. Sociobiological things are not objective in any way at all.No shit. You are a true master of the obvious.
(June 1, 2016 at 10:17 pm)Light of Truth Wrote: In regards to defining "God," I am working from an idea of the Christian God, which revealed Himself in the Resurrection, which has historical evidence. Then, you have the various arguments for the existence of God to lead you to the Resurrection (cosmological, teleological, moral arguments, etc. which ARE NOT fallacious in anyway, just not what some people like to hear).
Cosmological, teleological and moral arguments are like Jedi Mind Tricks, they only work on the weak minded. All of these have been refuted hundreds of years ago. Please try to catch up.
The most amusing part is where you claim the Christian God revealed himself in the Resurrection. So what your telling me is that the following weren't good enough:
- drown the entire fucking world except for one family
- speak through a burning bush
- suspend the sun so that the chosen can vanquish their enemy
- ensure that all is required to vanquish an enemy is parade around seven times and blow horns
- anoint a king despite god given warnings against the maneuver
- redundant plagues that even temporarily convince Pharaoh
- plenty more where this came from
All of this and Christians don't believe until the resurrection of Jesus. You dipshits might be more skeptical than I give you credit for. If the resurrection of Jesus is what convinces you, Christians must be on God's slow learner curriculum.
